Author: Anya Kamenetz
Length: 265
pages
Price: $23.95
Reading time: 6
hours
Reading rating:
3 (1=very hard, 10=very easy)
Overall rating:
2 (1=average, 4=outstanding)
Special to the Asheville Citizen Times, January 22,
2007
Generation Debt expands on a series freelance columnist Anya Kamenetz wrote for New York
City's Village Voice newspaper. The title is a bit misleading, because it
conjurers up visions of credit card and mortgage debt, and while these things
figure peripherally, the twin demons of Kamenetz's
story are crushing student loans and low-wage, no-benefit temporary jobs
(reasonably described as "crap jobs.")
College tuition
and fees have grown significantly faster than inflation. State-funded institutions such as WCU offer a
refuge from this spiraling cost, and Kamenetz
particularly champions community colleges as dollar-wise providers of the first
two years of college. Taken at face
value, college costs should be expected to absorb more of average household
income than ever before. This is likely
the case, but it obscures three reasons why colleges raise tuition. First, colleges have to cover their own
rising costs. Primarily, this would
account for tuition rising at or around the inflation rate, but not
dramatically above it.
Second, colleges
raise tuition so they have more leeway to tailor financial aid packages to
attract the most desirable students.
Usually this means the most academically desirable, but it can also be
used to attract accomplished athletes and well-rounded student leaders. In economic terms, since everyone pays a
discounted price, but everyone's discount from full tuition is different,
colleges discriminate to extract the most revenue from each student. It's like flying on an airplane where
everyone has paid different prices for the same ticket. This leads to tuition growing faster than
inflation, but remember, most people are not paying the full price.
Third, some
colleges raise tuition in an effort to signal quality. If Harvard and Yale are going to charge
$45,000.00 a year, how can some less-known, less-prestigious school pretend it
is a close substitute if it only charges $34,000.00? If the schools get any additional revenue
from this gambit, it's a safe bet they can find a way to spend it. Schools increasingly compete in offering
newer and ever more expensive non-educational amenities,
including gyms, recreation centers, and larger dormitories (or
"townhouses,") further driving up costs. So actual college costs are still rising much
faster than inflation, because what's being financed is rapidly expanding.
Problems facing
higher education finance in the last forty years have actually contributed to
higher costs and higher student debt.
When federal and state governments first balked at increasing the level
of higher education finance around 1970, the solution was to supplement
outright grants with government-guaranteed loans. This made sense as a temporary solution. Also, the cost was modest by today's
standards, because tuition was still fairly low.
As large
percentages of the population attend college, making Americans one of the
best-educated societies in human history, the rising cost has forced the
government to shift more of the burden from grants to loans. Otherwise, taxpayers would probably
revolt. Today, students can incur
tremendous debt in just one semester, which they can't escape through
bankruptcy, and which may not contribute to completing their education or
providing meaningful job skills. Every
year, more students complete their studies, either through graduation or simply
by giving up on further education, to start low-wage careers that effectively
preclude any possibility of their ever being able to service their student loan
debt.
Students today
pay too much for their education, and don't have access to the right kind of
education rewarded in labor markets.
They borrow too much to pay for college, and after low-interest
government-backed loans are exhausted, they pay too much interest, including
financing some of their education and expenses with credit cards charging up to
30%. Then they have to settle for
low-paying jobs with little prospect for advancement, no security, and no
benefits. Although housing prices
continue to rise, the risk that they could collapse,
leaving homeowners stuck with enormous mortgage debt backed by much less
valuable homes, will always be a recurrent nightmare.
Generation Debt is compelling reading in large part
because it draws together disparate bits of the contemporary economic
experience. The book is weak on analysis
and integration, and often seems too much an assortment of weakly related
anecdotes, but is to be applauded for suggesting connections between subjects
like college financial aid, credit-card debt, and labor market transformation.
Robert F.
Mulligan is associate professor of economics in the Department of Business Computer
Information Systems and Economics of the College of Business at Western
Carolina University. His research
interests are monetary economics and constitutional political economy. For previously reviewed books, visit our web
site at www.wcu.edu/cob/bookreviews.